Fallout of Prigozhin's Assassination on Russia and Putin

In a recent interview on Freedom TV, political commentator and host Dmitry Elovsky delved into the complex web of political consequences following the mysterious death of Yevgeny Prigozhin, a figure with ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin. The discussion shed light on the evolving dynamics within Russia's political scene and the potential implications of Prigozhin's demise.

The interview began with Elovsky addressing the various opinions regarding how Prigozhin's death might impact Putin's position. Some argued that it could strengthen Putin's grip on power, while others believed it could weaken his regime due to the internal confusion it caused among those once close to the President.

Elovsky emphasized that Prigozhin, often referred to as "Putin's cook" due to his previous culinary ventures, was not a typical member of the Russian elite. He noted that Prigozhin's ambitions and actions were perceived as unpredictable, potentially disrupting the status quo and provoking rebellion.

Elovsky expressed the view that Putin's system might benefit from the "worse the better" scenario, implying that increased instability could hasten its ultimate resolution. However, the Russian opposition, both within and outside the country, faced challenges in harnessing this instability to effect change.

Regarding the future, Elovsky discussed the potential for the emergence of new paramilitary brigades in Russia, as Putin allowed governors to form private military companies. While these entities may not replicate Prigozhin's direct ambitions, they introduce an element of unpredictability to an already complex political landscape.

Elovsky also highlighted the divided Russian response to Prigozhin's death, with no consensus on his role or the void left by his absence. He mentioned calls from figures like Mikhail Khodorkovsky for the opposition to arm itself and prepare for a power shift, but skepticism among Russian officials regarding the motives of these opposition figures.

When questioned about who might be in danger following Prigozhin's death, Elovsky dismissed the notion that Ramzan Kadyrov posed a significant threat to Putin. He suggested that eliminating Kadyrov would create another instability hotspot in the North Caucasus region, which Putin would want to avoid.

Elovsky concluded by discussing Putin's leadership style, emphasizing that it relies on fear rather than loyalty. He dismissed the notion of a peaceful, democratic transition in Russia and stressed that Putin's inner circle remained the key to any change in leadership.

In retrospect, Prigozhin's death has stirred speculation and uncertainty within Russian politics, offering glimpses into a turbulent future. As Russia navigates these uncharted waters, the world watches closely, awaiting developments that could shape the nation's trajectory in unforeseen ways.